Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations

Author:

Wolf Susan M.,Branum Rebecca,Koenig Barbara A.,Petersen Gloria M.,Berry Susan A.,Beskow Laura M.,Daly Mary B.,Fernandez Conrad V.,Green Robert C.,LeRoy Bonnie S.,Lindor Noralane M.,O'Rourke P. Pearl,Breitkopf Carmen Radecki,Rothstein Mark A.,Van Ness Brian,Wilfond Benjamin S.

Abstract

The debate about how to manage individual research results and incidental findings in genetic and genomic research has focused primarily on what information, if any, to offer back to research participants. However, increasing controversy surrounds the question of whether researchers have any responsibility to offer a participant’s results (defined here to include both individual research results and incidental findings) to the participant’s relatives, including after the participant’s death. This question arises in multiple contexts, including when researchers discover a result with potentially important health implications for genetic relatives, when a participant’s relatives ask a researcher whether any research results about the participant have implications for their own health or reproductive planning, when a participant’s relative asks whether any of the participant’s results have implications for a child’s health, and when the participant is deceased and the participant’s relatives seek information about the participant’s genetic results in order to address their own health or reproductive concerns.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference81 articles.

1. Kinscapes, timescapes and genescapes: families living with genetic risk

2. The Hastings Center Guidelines for Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment and Care Near the End of Life

3. Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results

4. 54. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425 (Cal. 1976).

5. “Privacy and Health Information Technology,”;McGraw;Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics,2014

Cited by 79 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3