Face and content validity of a mobile delirium screening tool adapted for use in the medical setting (eDIS‐MED): Welcome to the machine

Author:

Eeles Eamonn123ORCID,Tronstad Oystein45,Teodorczuk Andrew26789,Flaws Dylan251011,Fraser John F5,Dissanayaka Nadeeka3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Internal Medicine Services The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Northside Clinical School, School of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Physiotherapy department The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. Critical Care Research Group The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

7. The Prince Charles Hospital Metro North Mental Health Brisbane Queensland Australia

8. School of Medicine and Dentistry Griffith University Southport Queensland Australia

9. School of Nursing QUT Brisbane Queensland Australia

10. School of Clinical Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

11. Department of Mental Health Caboolture Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesFollowing a user‐centred redesign and refinement process of an electronic delirium screening tool (eDIS‐MED), further accuracy assessment was performed prior to anticipated testing in the clinical setting.MethodsContent validity of each of the existing questions was evaluated by an expert group in the domains of clarity, relevance and importance. Questions with a Content Validity Index (CVI) <0.80 were reviewed by the development group for potential revision. Items with CVI <0.70 were discarded. Next, face validity of the entirety of the tests was conducted and readability measured.ResultsA panel of five clinical experts evaluated the test battery comprising eDIS‐MED. The content validity process endorsed 61 items. The overall scale CVI was 0.92. Eighty‐eight per cent of the responses with regard to question relevancy, usefulness and appropriateness were positive. The questions were deemed fifth grade level and very easy to read.ConclusionsA revised electronic screening tool was shown to be accurate according to an expert group. A clinical validation study is planned.

Funder

University of Queensland

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3