Variables included in cerebral palsy registries globally: A scoping review

Author:

Katangwe Thembi J.1ORCID,Kruger Mariana12ORCID,Chimowa Takondwa3,Maposa Innocent4,Van Toorn Ronald1ORCID,Solomons Regan1ORCID,Donald Kirsten A.35ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital Cape Town South Africa

2. School of Applied Human Sciences (Psychology) University of Kwa‐Zulu Natal Durban South Africa

3. Division of Paediatric Neurodevelopment, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town and Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital Cape Town South Africa

4. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Stellenbosch University Cape Town South Africa

5. The Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town South Africa

Abstract

AbstractAimTo identify cerebral palsy (CP) variables collected in CP registries from high‐income countries (HICs) and low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) to assist with the development of a regional CP registry relevant to the African region.MethodA systematic search of online databases to identify peer‐reviewed publications and grey literature about CP risk‐factor variables, using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and Google Scholar.ResultsA total of 197 studies published from global CP registries between 1990 and 2023 were identified. CP registries both from HICs and from LMICs included variables on prenatal CP risk factors. LMIC registries focused more on socioeconomic factors (the physical structure of the family home [21.1%, n = 8, in LMICs vs 1.7%, n = 2, in HICs]). Prenatal modifiable and non‐modifiable risk factors were emphasized in HICs. LMIC registries included more postnatal CP risk‐factor variables than HIC registries, including history of postnatal jaundice (15.8%, n = 6, in LMICs vs 6.9%, n = 8, in HICs) and postnatal head trauma (10.5%, n = 4, in LMICs vs 5.2%, n = 6, in HICs).InterpretationCP registries are currently more available in HICs than in LMICs. Differences in CP risk factors account for most of the differences in variables included in HICs and LMICs. Comparing variables used by CP registries in HICs and LMICs suggests the importance of understanding contextually relevant factors for regional registry design.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3