Measuring the alveolar bone level in adolescents: A comparison between ultrasound and cone beam computed tomography

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging modality, which is used routinely in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning but delivers much higher radiation than conventional dental radiographs. Ultrasound is a noninvasive imaging method that creates an image without ionizing radiation.AimTo investigate the reliability of ultrasound and the agreement between ultrasound and CBCT in measuring the alveolar bone level (ABL) on the buccal/labial side of the incisors in adolescent orthodontic patients.DesignOne hundred and eighteen incisors from 30 orthodontic adolescent patients were scanned by CBCT with 0.3‐mm voxel size and ultrasound at 20 MHz frequency. The ABL, distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest (ABC), was measured twice to evaluate the agreement between ultrasound and CBCT. In addition, the intra‐ and inter‐rater reliabilities in measuring the ABL by four raters were compared.ResultsThe mean difference (MD) in the ABL between ultrasound and CBCT was −0.07 mm with 95% limit of agreement (LoA) from −0.47 to 0.32 mm for all teeth. For each jaw, the MDs between the ultrasound and CBCT were −0.18 mm (for mandible with 95% LoA from −0.53 to 0.18 mm) and 0.03 mm (for maxilla with 95% LoA from −0.28 to 0.35 mm). In comparison, ultrasound had higher intra‐rater (ICC = 0.83–0.90) and inter‐rater reliabilities (ICC = 0.97) in ABL measurement than CBCT (ICC = 0.56–0.78 for intra‐rater and ICC = 0.69 for inter‐rater reliabilities).ConclusionCBCT parameters used in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning in adolescents may not be a reliable tool to assess the ABL for the mandibular incisors. On the contrary, ultrasound imaging, an ionizing radiation‐free, inexpensive, and portable diagnostic tool, has potential to be a reliable diagnostic tool in assessing the ABL in adolescent patients.