Practitioners' perspectives on preparing for and delivering remote psychological support in Nepal, Perú and the United States during COVID‐19

Author:

Pedersen Gloria A.1ORCID,Elnasseh Abdelrhman1ORCID,Bhattacharya Bani2ORCID,Moran Leydi3ORCID,Neupane Vibha4ORCID,Galea Jerome T.56ORCID,Contreras Carmen37ORCID,Pfeffer Kendall A.8ORCID,Brown Adam D.89ORCID,Sangraula Manaswi8,Luitel Nagendra P.4ORCID,Kohrt Brandon A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Center for Global Mental Health Equity The George Washington University Washington DC USA

2. Milken Institute School of Public Health The George Washington University Washington DC USA

3. Socios En Salud Sucursal Perú Lima Peru

4. Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO) Nepal Kathmandu Nepal

5. School of Social Work University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

6. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Harvard Global Health Institute Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Psychology The New School for Social Research New York City New York USA

9. Department of Psychiatry New York University School of Medicine New York City New York USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe COVID‐19 pandemic has propelled a global paradigm shift in how psychological support is delivered. Remote delivery, through phone and video calls, is now commonplace around the world. However, most adoption of remote delivery methods is occurring without any formal training to ensure safe and effective care.ObjectiveThe purpose of this applied qualitative study was to determine practitioners' experiences of rapidly adapting to deliver psychological support remotely during COVID‐19.DesignWe used a pragmatic paradigm and applied approach to gain perspectives related to the feasibility and perceived usefulness of synchronous remote psychological support, including views on how practitioners can be prepared.MethodsKey informant interviews were conducted remotely with 27 specialist and non‐specialist practitioners in Nepal, Perú and the USA. Interviewees were identified through purposeful sampling. Data were analysed using framework analysis.ResultsRespondents revealed three key themes: (i) Remote delivery of psychological support raises unique safety concerns and interference with care, (ii) Remote delivery enhances skills and expands opportunities for delivery of psychological support to new populations, and (iii) New training approaches are needed to prepare specialist and non‐specialist practitioners to deliver psychological support remotely.ConclusionsRemote psychological support is feasible and useful for practitioners, including non‐specialists, in diverse global settings. Simulated remote role plays may be a scalable method for ensuring competency in safe and effective remotely‐delivered care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3