1. Pepper at 617.
2. Dauer & Left, Correspondence: The Lawyer as Friend, 86 Yale L.J. 573, 577–78 (1977);
3. Simon, The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics, 1978 Wis. L. Rev. 29, 108–9; Postema, Moral Responsibility in Professional Ethics, 55 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 63 (1980).
4. Pepper at 617. I have paraphrased Pepper's use of premise 3 somewhat. He regards it as a premise concerning the role of access to law in realizing individual autonomy, a fact that implies that access to lawyers is essential. But phrased that way it overlaps with premise 1 in a somewhat confusing fashion: premise 1 says roughly that law is intended to be one way to increase autonomy-one sufficient condition for increasing autonomy-while premise 3 says that law will be a necessary condition for increasing autonomy.
5. Pepper at 634.