Added value of advanced workup after the first seizure: A 7‐year cohort study

Author:

De Stefano Pia12ORCID,Ménétré Eric1,Stancu Patrick1,Mégevand Pierre1,Vargas Maria Isabelle3,Kleinschmidt Andreas1,Vulliémoz Serge1ORCID,Wiest Roland4,Beniczky Sandor56ORCID,Picard Fabienne1,Seeck Margitta1

Affiliation:

1. EEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

2. Neuro‐Intensive Care Unit, Department of Intensive Care University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

3. Neuroradiology Department University Hospitals of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

4. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital University of Berne Bern Switzerland

5. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus and Danish Epilepsy Center Dianalund Denmark

6. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to establish whether advanced workup including long‐term electroencephalography (LT‐EEG) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides an additional yield for the diagnosis of new onset epilepsy (NOE) in patients presenting with a first seizure event (FSE).MethodsIn this population‐based study, all adult (≥16 years) patients presenting with FSE in the emergency department (ED) between March 1, 2010 and March 1, 2017 were assessed. Patients with obvious nonepileptic or acute symptomatic seizures were excluded. Routine EEG, LT‐EEG, brain computed tomography (CT), and brain MRI were performed as part of the initial workup. These examinations' sensitivity and specificity were calculated on the basis of the final diagnosis after 2 years, along with the added value of advanced workup (MRI and LT‐EEG) over routine workup (routine EEG and CT).ResultsOf the 1010 patients presenting with FSE in the ED, a definite diagnosis of NOE was obtained for 501 patients (49.6%). Sensitivity of LT‐EEG was higher than that of routine EEG (54.39% vs. 25.5%, p < .001). Similarly, sensitivity of MRI was higher than that of CT (67.98% vs. 54.72%, p = .009). Brain MRI showed epileptogenic lesions in an additional 32% compared to brain CT. If only MRI and LT‐EEG were considered, five would have been incorrectly diagnosed as nonepileptic (5/100, 5%) compared to patients with routine EEG and MRI (25/100, 25%, p = .0001). In patients with all four examinations, advanced workup provided an overall additional yield of 50% compared to routine workup.SignificanceOur results demonstrate the remarkable added value of the advanced workup launched already in the ED for the diagnosis of NOE versus nonepileptic causes of seizure mimickers. Our findings suggest the benefit of first‐seizure tracks or even units with overnight EEG, similar to stroke units, activated upon admission in the ED.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3