Automatic adjustment of oxygen concentration during high‐flow nasal cannula treatment using a targeted SpO2 feedback system

Author:

Seo Woo Jung1ORCID,Kim Eun Young2ORCID,Seo Ga Jin2ORCID,Suh Hee Jung2ORCID,Huh Jin Won3ORCID,Hong Sang‐Bum3ORCID,Koh Younsuck3ORCID,Lim Chae‐Man3

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital Inje University College of Medicine Goyang Republic of Korea

2. Intensive Care Nursing Team Asan Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea

3. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

Abstract

AbstractAimTo test whether targeted SpO2 feedback (TSF), an automatic control system for fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), achieves more time in the optimal SpO2 range and/or reduces the frequency of manual adjustments to administered FiO2 compared with conventional manual titration in patients with hypoxia on high‐flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy.Study DesignTwenty‐two patients were recruited from two hospitals. For each, two sessions of manual mode and two sessions of TSF were applied in a random order, each session lasting 2 h. The target SpO2 on TSF was 95%. Oxygen monitoring levels were classified into four SpO2 ranges: hypoxia (≤ 89%), borderline (90%–93%), optimal (94%–96%) and hyperoxia (≥ 97%). The two modes were compared based on the proportion of time spent in each SpO2 range and the number of manual FiO2 adjustments.ResultsThe proportion of time in the optimal SpO2 range was 20.5% under manual titration mode and 65.4% under TSF (p < .01). The proportions of time in the hypoxia range were 1.1% and 0.4%, respectively (p = .31), in the borderline range 4.7% and 3.5%, respectively (p = .54), and in the hyperoxia range 73.7% and 30.7%, respectively (p < .01). There were statistical differences only in the optimal and hyperoxia SpO2 ranges. During the 8 h, the frequency of manual FiO2 adjustment was 0.7 times for the manual mode and 0.2 times for TSF, showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.076).ConclusionCompared with manual titration, TSF achieved greater time of the optimal SpO2 and less time of hyperoxia during HFNC. The frequency of manual adjustments on TSF tended to be less than on manual titration mode.Relevance to Clinical PracticeAutomatic closed‐loop algorithm FiO2 monitoring systems can achieve better oxygen treatments than conventional monitoring and may reduce nurse workloads. In the era of pandemic respiratory diseases, this system can also facilitate contactless SpO2 monitoring during HFNC therapy.

Funder

Korea Health Industry Development Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Reference26 articles.

1. A Re-evaluation of Oxygen Therapy and Hyperoxemia in Critical Care

2. Cerebral hypoxia: some new approaches and unanswered questions

3. Hypoxia and Inflammation

4. Hypoxemia in patients with COPD: cause, effects, and disease progression;Kent BD;Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis,2011

5. Hypoxia and chronic lung disease

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3