Affiliation:
1. University of Newcastle Callaghan Australia
2. Deakin University Geelong Australia
3. Bentley University Waltham Massachusetts USA
4. University of Southern Queensland Darling Heights Australia
Abstract
AbstractResearch Question/IssueWe examine the association between foreign institutional ownership and climate change disclosure quality from 2006 to 2018 across 34 countries. We find that firms with a higher level of foreign institutional ownership demonstrate better quality climate change disclosures, whereas domestic institutional ownership has immaterial impacts on such disclosures. We utilize a difference‐in‐differences (DiD) analysis using a firm's addition to the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) index as an exogenous shock to control for endogeneity. Our findings are robust to various other endogeneity controls. We also establish evidence on an indirect effect of climate change disclosure quality in mediating the positive association between foreign institutional investors and firm valuation.Research Findings/InsightsWe find that the positive association between foreign institutional ownership and climate change disclosure quality is more pronounced for (1) firms domiciled in stakeholder‐orientated countries, (2) firms domiciled in countries that adopt emission trading schemes, and (3) firms with a greater level of information asymmetry. Additionally, our results are more robust when foreign investors are domiciled in countries that care more about the environment.Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsOur study contributes to climate change disclosures, corporate governance, and international business literature by showing that foreign rather than domestic institutional investors contribute to improved corporate climate change disclosure quality in their portfolio firms.Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsOur study urges regulators to increase their market oversight, especially in firms with less foreign institutional ownership. This is required because such firms are prone to exhibiting poorer accountability for their climate risk management practices, and their disclosures are bereft of effective external monitoring mechanisms.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference76 articles.
1. Temperature Shocks and Establishment Sales
2. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors
3. Portfolio preferences of foreign institutional investors
4. Ang G. &Copeland H.(2018).Integrating climate change‐related factors in institutional investment.Background Paper for the 36th OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development.https://www.oecd.org/sd‐roundtable/papersandpublications/Integrating%20Climate%20Change‐related%20Factors%20in%20Institutional%20Investment.pdf(accessed on 20 March 2023).
5. The Big Three and corporate carbon emissions around the world
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献