The impact of semen parameters on ICSI and pregnancy outcomes in egg recipient cycles with PGT‐A

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe egg donation model offers an opportunity to isolate the male factor and evaluate its impact on IVF–intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes.ObjectiveTo study the effect of non‐obstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes compared with severe oligozoospermia and mild‐to‐moderate oligozoospermia in egg recipient cycles.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study, including 1594 patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection in egg recipient cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. The cohort was divided into three groups: couples with non‐obstructive azoospermia accounting for 479 patients (30%); couples with severe oligozoospermia (sperm number <5 × 106/mL), accounting for 442 patients (27.8%); couples with mild‐to‐moderate oligozoospermia, with sperm number >5 × 106and <15 × 106/mL, accounting for 673 patients (42.2%).ResultsThe fertilisation rate was significantly reduced in the non‐obstructive azoospermia group as compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild‐to‐moderate oligozoospermia group: 30.3% versus 63% and 77.3% (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders highlighted non‐obstructive azoospermia as a negative predictor of obtaining a euploid blastocyst both per injected oocyte and per obtained blastocyst. The miscarriage rate in the non‐obstructive azoospermia group was 11.8%; higher than the severe oligozoospermia and mild‐to‐moderate oligozoospermia groups (7% and 2.7%) (p < 0.05). The live birth rate per embryo transfer (ET) was significantly lower in the non‐obstructive azoospermia group compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild‐to‐moderate oligozoospermia group (20.4% vs. 30.3% and 35.4%, p < 0.05). The risk of preterm labour was significantly higher in the non‐obstructive azoospermia group, compared with the severe oligozoospermia and mild‐to‐moderate oligozoospermia group (55.1% vs. 46.8% and 16.1%, p < 0.001), and this difference was observed in both singleton and twin pregnancies.Discussion and conclusionIn our retrospective comparative study, non‐obstructive azoospermia significantly affects early embryonic potential and live birth rates per cycle and per embryo transfer. It is also associated with higher risk of preterm birth. Future prospective multi‐centre studies are needed to highlight the effect of sperm quality on ART and pregnancy outcomes.