Do help‐seeking adolescents report more psychotic‐like experiences than young adults on the 16‐item version of the prodromal questionnaire (PQ‐16)?

Author:

de Jong Yvonne12,Boon Albert E.13,Mulder Cornelis L.12,van der Gaag Mark4

Affiliation:

1. Youz Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Parnassia Psychiatric Institute Rotterdam and The Hague The Netherlands

2. Department of Psychiatry, Epidemiological and Psychiatric Research institute Erasmus MC Rotterdam The Netherlands

3. LUMC Curium—Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

4. Department of Clinical Psychology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimTo compare psychotic‐like experiences (PLEs) in adolescents and young adults referred to the Mental Health Services (MHSs).MethodsParticipants scored the 16‐item Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ‐16) as part of the intake procedure. Data on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classification and demographic data were collected.ResultsThe PQ‐16 was completed by 13 783 respondents (mean age 24.63 years, SD = 6.09; 62.6% female). Overall, the scores on the PQ‐16 were not higher for adolescents (11–17 years; m = 4.84, SD = 3.62) than for young adults (18–35 years; m = 5.47, SD = 3.85). On PQ‐16 item level, adolescents reported seeing and hearing things more than adults did. Across all age groups, males scored lower on the PQ‐16 than females. Specifically, adolescent males scored lower than other participants. For adolescents and young adults alike, PQ‐16 scores were higher for participants with borderline personality disorder, PTSD, and mood disorder than for those with other DSM classifications.ConclusionsAlthough help‐seeking adolescents did not score higher on the PQ‐16 than help‐seeking young adults, more of them reported perceptual anomalies. Irrespective of age, participants with borderline personality disorder, PTSD and mood disorder scored higher on the PQ‐16 than those with other DSM classifications.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3