Hybrid governance and intersectional discrimination: An examination of women's experiences in South Africa

Author:

van Dijk Gerda1ORCID,Mangai Mary S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Management and Administration (SPMA) University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa

Abstract

AbstractThis research investigates the lived experiences of women in South Africa, focusing on the concept of hybrid governance and intersectional discrimination. Hybrid governance denotes a blend of modern and traditional governance structures that coexist in many post‐colonial societies, including South Africa. Intersectional discrimination recognises that individuals face layers of discrimination simultaneously influenced by intersecting identities like race, gender, class, and ethnicity. This study utilised quantitative analysis and desktop research methods. The researchers employed theoretical and operational parameters to conduct a logistic regression analysis using data from the 2018/2019 Governance, Public Safety and Justice Survey (GPSJS) conducted by Statistics South Africa. The analysis aims to investigate how hybrid governance structures impact women's lives and the interconnectedness among forms of discrimination they encounter. The results shed light on the power dynamics, representation challenges, and discriminatory practices within the realm of hybrid governance. Women's experiences showcase how patriarchal norms, racial disparities, and socio‐economic factors intersect to heighten discrimination levels and constrain women's autonomy. Additionally, the study emphasises the significance of recognising and addressing intersectionality as a framework for comprehending and responding to the multi‐faceted challenges faced by women in South Africa.Points for practitioners Practitioners should appreciate the cultural diversity in South Africa and respect the varying customs and practices that come with hybrid governance. They should understand that traditional governance structures can coexist with modern ones, but also ensure that these structures do not perpetuate discriminatory practices. Practitioners should understand that individuals may face multiple, intersecting forms of discrimination. They should therefore approach work with an intersectional lens, taking into account the ways in which factors like race, gender, and tribal affiliation can compound discrimination. Practitioners should encourage dialogue about discrimination within the communities in which they work. They should raise awareness about what constitutes discrimination and how individuals can report it. Practitioners should utilise available data to inform their work. They should regularly review and analyse data on discrimination to identify trends and patterns, and to inform strategies and interventions.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference46 articles.

1. Gendered transformation in South African jurisprudence: Poor women and the Constitutional Court;Albertyn C.;Stellenbosch Law Review,2011

2. Feminist Frontiers in Climate Justice

3. Intersectionality: From theory to practice;Al‐Faham H.;Annual Review of Law and Social Science,2019

4. Farming methods and the livelihood outcomes of women in Eastern Uganda;Amayo F.;Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development,2021

5. Technocracy and populism after the boom and bust;Bell D.;Government and Opposition,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3