Affiliation:
1. School of Veterinary Medicine University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
2. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Norwegian University of Life Sciences Oslo Norway
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the anatomical relationship of the congenital calcaneal bursae in the bovine, and describe the computed tomography (CT), endoscopic and gross anatomy of these bursae.Study designEx vivo experimental.Sample populationEighteen clinically normal cadaver bovine hindlimbs.MethodsIntrasynovial injection of iodinated contrast and methylene blue into the intertendinous calcaneal bursa (ICB) (n = 16) or gastrocnemius calcaneal bursa (GCB) (n = 2). Limbs were imaged post‐contrast injection using multidetector CT. Endoscopic examination of the ICB was performed on two randomly selected limbs. All limbs underwent gross anatomical dissection.ResultsThe anatomy of the congenital calcaneal bursae was consistent between CT imaging, endoscopic examination and gross dissection. The ICB and GCB were two separate synovial structures with no communication in all limbs. The distal and proximal extent of the ICB, defined as the distance from the point of tuber calcanei to the distal/proximal aspect of the ICB, was (median [IQR]) 7.4 (7.4 to 7.8) cm distally and 5.4 (4.7 to 6.0) cm proximally.ConclusionPositive contrast CT and gross anatomical dissection revealed no communication between the congenital calcaneal bursae in any limb. Routine bursoscopy allowed complete endoscopic examination of the ICB. The proximal extent of the ICB is shorter than the distal extent. The use of a collective term for these bursae should be avoided in the bovine, as the ICB and the GCB are two separate synovial structures with no communication.Clinical significanceKnowledge of distinct anatomy and relationship between the congenital calcaneal bursae in the bovine may facilitate diagnosis and treatment of disorders affecting the region of tuber calcanei, including septic bursitis and osteomyelitis.