Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery and Medical‐Surgical Specialties (Area of Stomatology. Unit of Periodontology), Faculty of Medicine and Odontology University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain
2. Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Unit of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal
3. Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry (Periodontology) University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
Abstract
AbstractThis review aimed to answer the general question of whether autologous platelet concentrates (APCs, an autologous blood‐derivative) can improve the outcome of alveolar bone augmentation. Three clinical scenarios were assessed: horizontal/vertical bone augmentation in combination with implant placement (simultaneous approach), horizontal bone augmentation in a staged approach, and vertical bone augmentation in a staged approach. An electronic literature search strategy was conducted for each review from the outset to July 1st, 2023. The titles and abstracts (when available) of all identified studies were screened and imported into a database. If articles appeared to meet the inclusion criteria or their title and abstract had insufficient data, the full text was obtained to make the final decision. All studies that met the inclusion criteria underwent data extraction. Moreover, the references of the identified papers were screened for additional studies. After title and abstract screening and selection criteria application, 14 clinical studies were included for the qualitative analysis: seven for horizontal/vertical bone augmentation in a simultaneous approach, five for horizontal bone augmentation in a staged approach, and two for vertical bone augmentation in a staged approach. There is scarce literature regarding the added value of APCs in bone augmentation, and most studies had small sample sizes, a lack of standardized protocols, and different outcome variables, which makes comparisons between studies difficult. Out of the 14 studies, four were well‐designed randomized clinical trials, where we could find better results for the APCs groups. Most studies, particularly comparative and well‐designed studies, demonstrated beneficial and promising results of using APCs in alveolar bone augmentation. However, before high‐level evidence‐based conclusions can be drawn, more randomized clinical trials must compare the benefits of adding APCs to the gold‐standard approach.
Reference74 articles.
1. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials;Esposito M;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2006
2. Long‐term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5‐year prospective study in partially edentulous patients;Buser D;Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2002
3. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry;Chiapasco M;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2009
4. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants ‐ a Cochrane systematic review;Esposito M;Eur J Oral Implantol,2009
5. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy)