Reporting Quality of Single‐Case Research Published in Learning Disabilities Journals

Author:

Hott Brittany L.1ORCID,Heiniger Sarah1,Justus Jasmine1,Randolph Kathleen M.2ORCID,Al Shabibi Amal1,Beasley Brooki1,Frank Kerry1,Mitchell Wendy1,Tennell Courtney1,Wester Fanee1

Affiliation:

1. University of Oklahoma Norman USA

2. Texas State University San Marcos USA

Abstract

AbstractSingle‐case research designs are useful for learning disability researchers interested in refining novel interventions (e.g., new mathematics intervention) before scaling, small n populations (e.g., students with comorbid learning and emotional and behavioral disabilities), and testing unique conditions (e.g., remote locales). Much attention has been devoted to developing research quality standards, which is essential for replication and implementation fidelity; however, little is known about the reporting quality of single‐case design studies. To gain insight into the quality of learning disability single‐case research design study reporting, we analyzed 72 articles published between 2010 and 2021 in six learning disability‐focused journals using the Single‐Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioral interventions (SCRIBE) standards. Findings suggest that reporting quality has remained stagnant, and none of the studies reviewed met all of the reporting standards. Alignment with standards ranged from 33% to 77%. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Health (social science)

Reference88 articles.

1. Story grammar instruction with third and fifth grade students with learning disabilities and other struggling readers;Alves K. D.;Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal,2015

2. American Psychological Association. (2021).Journal article reporting standards: n‐of‐1 studies. Retrieved fromhttps://apastyle.apa.org/jars/quant‐table‐5.pdf

3. Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.

4. Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate

5. An examination of the addition of video informed reflective practice to the active support toolkit

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3