Factors influencing access to nonpharmacological interventions for community‐dwelling seniors with mild‐to‐moderate dementia: An integrative review

Author:

Hwang Jasmine Jihye1ORCID,Donnelly Tam Truong1ORCID,Raffin Bouchal Shelley1ORCID,Davidson Sandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Nursing University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

Abstract

What is Known on the Subject Research has shown effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in improving or maintaining cognition, mood, functioning, self‐efficacy and quality of life for persons with mild‐to‐moderate dementia (PWDs). These interventions are critical during the earlier stages of dementia. However, Canadian and international literature report underutilization of and difficulty accessing the interventions. What this Paper Adds to Existing Knowledge To our knowledge, this is the first review that explored factors influencing seniors' utilization of nonpharmacological interventions in the earlier stages of dementia. This review contributed to the discovery of unique factors such as PWDs' beliefs, fears, perceptions, and acceptability of nonpharmacological interventions and environmental influences on intervention provision. PWDs' intervention uptake may appear as a matter of personal choices related to individuals' knowledge, beliefs and perceptions. However, the analysis of the research evidence suggests that PWDs' choices are shaped by environmental factors such as formal and informal caregiver support, acceptability and accessibility of nonpharmacological interventions, dementia care workforce, community's attitudes towards dementia and funding. The complex interplay among factors highlights the importance of targeting health promotion strategies at both individuals and their environments. What are the Implications for Practice The review findings feature opportunities for healthcare practitioners, including mental health nurses, in advocating for PWDs' evidence‐informed decision‐making and access to desired nonpharmacological treatments. Involvement of patients and families in care‐planning through ongoing assessment of health and learning needs, as well as enablers and barriers to using interventions, continuing information provision, and personalized referrals to appropriate services can promote PWDs' rights to healthcare. AbstractIntroductionDespite the significance of nonpharmacological interventions in optimal management of mild‐to‐moderate dementia, it remains unclear in the literature how persons with mild‐to‐moderate dementia (PWDs) view, understand and access nonpharmacological interventions.AimThe purpose of this review was to explore the extent and nature of evidence concerning factors that influence the use of nonpharmacological interventions for community‐dwelling seniors with mild‐to‐moderate dementia.MethodAn integrative review was undertaken following Toronto and Remington (A step‐by‐step guide to conducting an integrative review, 2020)'s instruction which expanded Torraco (Human Resource Development Review, 2016, 15, 404)'s and Whittemore and Knafl (Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2005, 52, 546)'s guidance.ResultsThe review of 16 studies suggests that PWDs' use of nonpharmacological interventions is shaped by a complex interplay of various personal, interpersonal, organizational, community and political influences.DiscussionThe findings highlight the complex, interrelated relationships among multiple factors and subsequent limitations of behaviour‐oriented health promotion strategies. To assist PWDs in making healthier choices, health promotion strategies need to direct attention to both individuals' behaviours and environmental conditions impacting the behaviours.Implications for PracticeThe findings of this review can inform multidisciplinary health practitioners' (including mental health nurses) practice with seniors living with mild‐to‐moderate dementia. We recommend actionable ways in which they can empower patients and their families in dementia management.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pshychiatric Mental Health

Reference67 articles.

1. Alzheimer Society of Canada. (2010).Rising tide: The impact of dementia on Canadian society.https://alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/files/national/advocacy/asc_rising_tide_full_report_e.pdf

2. Alzheimer Society of Canada. (2016).Prevalence and monetary costs of dementia in Canada.https://alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Prevalence‐and‐costs‐of‐dementia‐in‐Canada_Alzheimer‐Society‐Canada.pdf

3. Alzheimer Society of Canada. (2021).Risk factors for dementia.https://alzheimer.ca/en/about‐dementia/how‐can‐i‐prevent‐dementia/risk‐factors‐dementia

4. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3