The real problem: The deadly combination of psychologisation, scientism, and normative promotionalism takes strategic human resource management down a 30‐year dead end-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The real problem: The deadly combination of psychologisation, scientism, and normative promotionalism takes strategic human resource management down a 30‐year dead end

Published:2020-01 Issue:1 Volume:30 Page:49-72
ISSN:0954-5395
Container-title:Human Resource Management Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Hum Resour Manag J

Author:

Kaufman Bruce E.¹²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of EconomicsGeorgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA

2. Centre for Work, Organization and Wellbeing and Department of Employment Relations & Human ResourcesGriffith University Brisbane QLD Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12278

Reference104 articles.

1. The scope and trajectory of strategic HR research: evidence from American and British journals

2. Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Institutional logics in play at work: how applying an institutional logics approach to employees’ intentions to quit contextualizes HRM;The International Journal of Human Resource Management;2024-07-24

2. Marsden as organization theorist;British Journal of Industrial Relations;2024-07-02

3. How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Performance Management Systems? An Overview of the Literature and a Proposed Integrative Model;Administrative Sciences;2024-06-03

4. Exploring representations of human resource management as moral dirty work: A film study;Human Resource Management;2024-05-17