Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma USA
2. Human Development and Family Studies University of Alabama Tuscaloosa Alabama USA
3. Department of Criminal Justice and Sociology University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USA
Abstract
AbstractNon‐human animals have long been embedded in society and are well‐documented as integrated into people's lives and families. However, researchers and practitioners inconsistently incorporate companion animals into theoretical conceptualizations of family, despite growing empirical evidence of the substantive impact of companion animals in people's lives. To more accurately capture people's lived realities of companion animals as family members, we advance a model of ecoexpansive kinship, which validates expansive family forms and functions across multiple levels of social ecological influence. To illustrate our model's applicability, we explore key definitions and outline major theoretical foundations and applications of companion animal research. We then demonstrate both the theoretical significance and empirical reality of where companion animal kinship fits into family dynamics. An ecoexpansive kinship approach can promote more conceptual, cohesive theorization of how to holistically model kinship to be inclusive of companion animals that can be applied across research and practice.
Reference111 articles.
1. Are Pets a Healthy Pleasure? The Influence of Pets on Blood Pressure
2. Anger and hostility among married couples: Pet dogs as moderators of cardiovascular reactivity to stress;Allen K.;Psychosomatic Medicine,1996
3. Family theorizing for social justice: A critical praxis
4. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (2023).Definition of companion animal.https://www.aspca.org/about-us/aspca-policy-and-position-statements/definition-companion-animal