Inappropriate prescribing in patients with kidney disease: A rapid review of prevalence, associated clinical outcomes and impact of interventions

Author:

Hamzaei Zohra1,Houlind Morten Baltzer234ORCID,Kjeldsen Lene Juel5,Christensen Louise Westberg Strejby23,Walls Anne Byriel46,Aharaz Anissa3,Olesen Charlotte7,Coric Faruk8,Revell Joo Hanne Poulsen5,Ravn‐Nielsen Lene Vestergaard8ORCID,Andersen Trine Rune Høgh9ORCID,Hedegaard Ulla1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

2. The Capital Region Pharmacy Herlev Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Research Copenhagen University Hospital–Amager and Hvidovre Hvidovre Denmark

4. Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

5. HoPRU Hospital Sønderjylland Aabenraa Denmark

6. The Capital Region Hospital Pharmacy Copenhagen Denmark

7. Hospital Pharmacy Central Denmark Region Aarhus Denmark

8. Hospital Pharmacy Funen Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

9. Region Zealand Hospital Pharmacy Roskilde Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe prevalence of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and polypharmacy is increasing and has amplified the importance of examining inappropriate prescribing (IP) in CKD. This review focuses on the latest research regarding the prevalence of IP in CKD and the related adverse clinical effects and explores new interventions against IP.MethodA literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library searching articles published between June 2016 and March 2022.ResultsTwenty‐seven studies were included. An IP prevalence of 12.6% to 96% and 0.3% to 66% was reported in hospital and outpatient settings, respectively. In nonhospital settings, the prevalence of IP varied between 3.9% and 60%. IP was associated with higher risk of hospitalisation (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17–1.81), higher bleeding rate (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.37) and higher risk of all‐cause mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.13). Three studies reported the impact of interventions on IP.ConclusionThis review highlights widespread IP in CKD patients across healthcare settings, with varying prevalence rates. IP is substantially linked to adverse outcomes in patients. While limited interventions show promise, urgent research is needed to develop effective strategies addressing IP and improving CKD patient care.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference82 articles.

1. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in Australian general practice: National Prescribing Service MedicineWise MedicineInsight dataset

2. BrownleeS GarberJ.Medication overload: America's other drug problem. In:Institute L ed.Lown Institute;2017.

3. Medication-related Problems in CKD

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3