Insomnia nosology: a systematic review and critical appraisal of historical diagnostic categories and current phenotypes

Author:

Nyhuis Casandra C.1ORCID,Fernandez‐Mendoza Julio2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Sciences Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA

2. Sleep Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

SummaryInsomnia nosology has significantly evolved since the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)‐III‐R first distinguished between ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ insomnia. Prior International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) nosology ‘split’ diagnostic phenotypes to address insomnia's heterogeneity and the DSM nosology ‘lumped’ them into primary insomnia, while both systems assumed causality for insomnia secondary to health conditions. In this systematic review, we discuss the historical phenotypes in prior insomnia nosology, present findings for currently proposed insomnia phenotypes based on more robust approaches, and critically appraise the most relevant ones. Electronic databases PsychINFO, PubMED, Web of Science, and references of eligible articles, were accessed to find diagnostic manuals, literature on insomnia phenotypes, including systematic reviews or meta‐analysis, and assessments of the reliability or validity of insomnia diagnoses, identifying 184 articles. The data show that previous insomnia diagnoses lacked reliability and validity, leading current DSM‐5‐TR and ICSD‐3 nosology to ‘lump’ phenotypes into a single diagnosis comorbid with health conditions. However, at least two new, robust insomnia phenotyping approaches were identified. One approach is multidimensional‐multimethod and provides evidence for self‐reported insomnia with objective short versus normal sleep duration linked to clinically relevant outcomes, while the other is multidimensional and provides evidence for two to five clusters (phenotypes) based on self‐reported trait, state, and/or life‐history data. Some approaches still need replication to better support whether their findings identify true phenotypes or simply different patterns of symptomatology. Regardless, these phenotyping efforts aim at improving insomnia nosology both as a classification system and as a mechanism to guide treatment.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine

Reference196 articles.

1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). (1997).International classification of sleep disorders revised (ICSD‐R).

2. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3