Improving health equity through health care systems research

Author:

Chisolm Deena J.1ORCID,Dugan Jerome A.2ORCID,Figueroa Jose F.3ORCID,Lane‐Fall Meghan B.4,Roby Dylan H.5,Rodriguez Hector P.6ORCID,Ortega Alexander N.7

Affiliation:

1. Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA

2. Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

3. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Brigham and Women's Hospital Cambridge Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, Program in Public Health University of California, Irvine Irvine California USA

6. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USA

7. Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo describe health equity research priorities for health care delivery systems and delineate a research and action agenda that generates evidence‐based solutions to persistent racial and ethnic inequities in health outcomes.Data Sources and Study SettingThis project was conducted as a component of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) stakeholder engaged process to develop an Equity Agenda and Action Plan to guide priority setting to advance health equity. Recommendations were developed and refined based on expert input, evidence review, and stakeholder engagement. Participating stakeholders included experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government.Study DesignExpert group consensus, informed by stakeholder engagement and targeted evidence review.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsPriority themes were derived iteratively through (1) brainstorming and idea reduction, (2) targeted evidence review of candidate themes, (3) determination of preliminary themes; (4) input on preliminary themes from stakeholders attending AHRQ's 2022 Health Equity Summit; and (5) and refinement of themes based on that input. The final set of research and action recommendations was determined by authors' consensus.Principal FindingsHealth care delivery systems have contributed to racial and ethnic disparities in health care. High quality research is needed to inform health care delivery systems approaches to undo systemic barriers and inequities. We identified six priority themes for research; (1) institutional leadership, culture, and workforce; (2) data‐driven, culturally tailored care; (3) health equity targeted performance incentives; (4) health equity‐informed approaches to health system consolidation and access; (5) whole person care; (6) and whole community investment. We also suggest cross‐cutting themes regarding research workforce and research timelines.ConclusionsAs the nation's primary health services research agency, AHRQ can advance equitable delivery of health care by funding research and disseminating evidence to help transform the organization and delivery of health care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3