“What choice do we have?” Reactive and proactive decision‐making for aging in place with dementia

Author:

Auriemma Catherine L.123ORCID,Butt Maayra I.1,McMillan Julia1,Silvestri Jasmine A.1,Chow Carolyn2ORCID,Bahti Melanie1,Klaiman Tamar1,Harkins Kristin2,Karlawish Jason45,Halpern Scott D.1236

Affiliation:

1. Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Penn Memory Center University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Division of Geriatrics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPromoting options for aging in place (AIP) has broad appeal to policymakers and professionals providing services to persons living with dementia (PWD). However, the benefits or burdens of AIP likely vary among individuals and families. We sought to describe factors influencing decision‐making to age in place versus seek a higher level of residential care for PWD.MethodsA qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger mixed‐methods study utilizing semi‐structured interviews with PWD, family care partners, and dementia clinicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with constant comparison. Sample size was determined by thematic saturation within subgroups.ResultsWe conducted 74 interviews among 14 PWD, 36 care partners, and 24 clinicians. Preferences for AIP were driven by (1) desire to preserve independence, (2) a sense that the “best care” is delivered by loved ones and in a familiar environment, (3) distrust and fear of care facilities, and (4) caregiver guilt. PWD and care partners frequently considered moving from home as a “last resort” and wanted to avoid planning for future care needs. Many decisions to move were reactive and triggered by patient safety events, physical dependency, or the loss of caregiver. Proactive decision‐making was facilitated by (1) prior experience witnessing the challenges of caring for a person with advanced dementia in the home; and (2) having substantial financial resources such that participants could seek major home adaptations or avoid “lower quality” institutions.ConclusionsDecisions regarding care setting for PWD frequently do not feel like a choice and are made under imperfect conditions. Programs using AIP as an outcome measure should recognize the various patient‐centered and non‐patient‐centered factors that influence such choices, and interventions should be designed to promote more informed and equitable decision‐making for care setting in dementia.

Funder

Alzheimer's Association

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3