Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Science and Services Royal Veterinary College University of London Hertfordshire UK
2. Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences Royal Veterinary College University of London Hertfordshire UK
3. Southfields Veterinary Specialists Essex UK
Abstract
AbstractUltrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspirates (FNA) of the liver and spleen for cytological analysis are a commonly performed procedure in canine veterinary practice. Based on our review of the literature, this is the first published study investigating whether needle size affects the diagnostic quality of hepatic and splenic samples. The aim of this prospective analytical study was to compare the diagnostic quality of ultrasound‐guided FNA cytological samples of canine liver and spleen based on cellularity, blood contamination, and overall cell preservation between three different needle sizes (22‐, 23‐, and 25‐gauge). A total of 282 splenic aspirates from 94 dogs and 348 hepatic aspirates from 116 dogs were enrolled in the study and examined by two board‐certified veterinary clinical pathologists. In this study, no significant differences in diagnostic quality were identified between different needle gauge sizes when sampling canine liver and spleen. Blood contamination was higher using 22‐gauge needles compared with 25‐gauge needles (P = 0.024) when sampling the liver.