Which is the best glomerular filtration marker: Creatinine, cystatin C or both?

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated by the serum or plasma concentration of creatinine and/or cystatin C using equations that include demographic data. The equations worldwide most widely used are those of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD‐EPI) consortium and updated in 2021 to remove the Afro‐American racial correction factor. In 2021 and then in 2023, the European Kidney Function Consortium also developed equations based on creatinine and cystatin C, usable across the full age spectrum, and constructed by including the Q value (i.e. the median creatinine or cystatin C in healthy men and women, which is customizable for specific populations).MethodsThe aim of this narrative review is to examine the strengths and weaknesses of each biomarker.ResultsBoth biomarkers have non‐GFR determinants, namely muscle mass, protein intake and tubular secretion for creatinine; dysthyroidism and systemic corticosteroids for cystatin C, as well as other more debated determinants (diabetes, obesity, proteinuria, inflammatory syndrome). These non‐GFR determinants are the reason why no equation based on a single endogenous biomarker has an accuracy within 30% greater than 90% over the entire age spectrum (in at least one patient in 10, estimated GFR is at least 30% higher or at least 30% lower than the measured GFR).ConclusionEquations combining the two biomarkers provide a better estimate of GFR, particularly in the subgroup of patients whose estimates based on each of the biomarkers are highly discordant. These patients must also be identified as being at increased risk of morbidity, particularly cardiovascular, and mortality.