Young people's perspectives on addressing UK health inequalities: utopian visions and preferences for action

Author:

Fergie Gillian1ORCID,Vaczy Caroline1,Smith Katherine23,Mackenzie Mhairi4,Phan Thu Thuy1,Hilton Shona1

Affiliation:

1. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

2. Centre for Health Policy School of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK

3. School of Social and Political Science University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

4. Urban Studies School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIt is increasingly recognised by UK researchers and population health advocates that an important impetus to effective policy action to address health inequalities is activation of public dialogue about the social determinants of health and how inequalities might be addressed. The limited body of existing scholarship reaches varying conclusions on public preferences for responding to health inequalities but with consensus around the importance of tackling poverty. Young people's perspectives remain underexplored despite their increasingly visible role in activism across a range of policy issues and the potential impact of widening inequalities on their generation's health and wellbeing.MethodsSix groups of young people (39 in total) from two UK cities (Glasgow and Leeds) were engaged in online workshops to explore views on health inequalities and potential solutions. Inspired by calls to employ notions of utopia, artist–facilitators and researchers supported participants to explore the evidence, debating solutions and imagining a more desirable society, using visual and performance art. Drawing together data from discussions and creative outputs, we analysed participants' perspectives on addressing health inequalities across four domains: governance, environment, society/culture and economy.FindingsProposals ranged from radical, whole‐systems change to support for policies currently being considered by governments across the United Kingdom. The consensus was built around embracing more participatory, collaborative governance; prioritising sustainability and access to greenspace; promoting inclusivity and eliminating discrimination and improving the circumstances of those on the lowest incomes. Levels of acceptable income inequality, and how best to address income inequality were more contested. Individual‐level interventions were rarely presented as viable options for addressing the social inequalities from which health differences emanate.ConclusionYoung people contributed wide‐ranging and visionary solutions to debates around addressing the enduring existence of health inequalities in the United Kingdom. Their reflections signal support for ‘upstream’ systemic change to achieve reductions in social inequalities and the health differences that flow from these.Public ContributionAn advisory group of young people informed the development of project plans. Participants shaped the direction of the project in terms of substantive focus and were responsible for the generation of creative project outputs aimed at influencing policymakers.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference62 articles.

1. What (or who) causes health inequalities: Theories, evidence and implications?

2. Desperately seeking reductions in health inequalities: perspectives of UK researchers on past, present and future directions in health inequalities research

3. MarmotM AllenJ BoyceT GoldblattP MorrisonJ. Health equity in England: the Marmot Review 10 years on.2020. Accessed January 10 2023.https://www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/the-marmot-review-10-years-on?gclid=CjwKCAjwwb6lBhBJEiwAbuVUSgTe017YlqHdOotxOkRvdKTc32FqLVXqxksru-95pMmK2VmfOi1kXxoC52gQAvD_BwE

4. Understanding lay perspectives on socioeconomic health inequalities in Britain: a meta-ethnography

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3