Predicting severe pain after major surgery: a secondary analysis of the Peri‐operative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) dataset

Author:

Armstrong R. A.12ORCID,Fayaz A.34,Manning G. L. P.4,Moonesinghe S. R.35ORCID,Oliver C. M.36, ,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

2. Department of Anaesthesia University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK

3. Department of Anaesthesia and Peri‐operative Medicine University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK

4. Central London School of Anaesthesia London UK

5. Centre for Peri‐operative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK

6. Centre for Peri‐operative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London UK

Abstract

SummaryAcute postoperative pain is common, distressing and associated with increased morbidity. Targeted interventions can prevent its development. We aimed to develop and internally validate a predictive tool to pre‐emptively identify patients at risk of severe pain following major surgery. We analysed data from the UK Peri‐operative Quality Improvement Programme to develop and validate a logistic regression model to predict severe pain on the first postoperative day using pre‐operative variables. Secondary analyses included the use of peri‐operative variables. Data from 17,079 patients undergoing major surgery were included. Severe pain was reported by 3140 (18.4%) patients; this was more prevalent in females, patients with cancer or insulin‐dependent diabetes, current smokers and in those taking baseline opioids. Our final model included 25 pre‐operative predictors with an optimism‐corrected c‐statistic of 0.66 and good calibration (mean absolute error 0.005, p = 0.35). Decision‐curve analysis suggested an optimal cut‐off value of 20–30% predicted risk to identify high‐risk individuals. Potentially modifiable risk factors included smoking status and patient‐reported measures of psychological well‐being. Non‐modifiable factors included demographic and surgical factors. Discrimination was improved by the addition of intra‐operative variables (likelihood ratio χ2 496.5, p < 0.001) but not by the addition of baseline opioid data. On internal validation, our pre‐operative prediction model was well calibrated but discrimination was moderate. Performance was improved with the inclusion of peri‐operative covariates suggesting pre‐operative variables alone are not sufficient to adequately predict postoperative pain.

Funder

Royal College of Anaesthetists

University College London

Health Foundation Limburg

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3