Subclonal p53 immunostaining in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma molecular subtype

Abstract

AimsThe significance of subclonal expression of p53 (abrupt transition from wild‐type to mutant‐pattern staining) is not well understood, and the arbitrary diagnostic cut‐off of 10% between NSMP and p53abn molecular subtypes of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has not been critically assessed. Our aim was to characterise subclonal p53 and discrepant p53 expression/TP53 sequencing results in EC and assess their clinical significance.Methods and resultsSubclonal p53 immuostaining on whole sections from 957 ECs was recorded. Agreement between TP53 mutational assessment and p53 immunostaining was evaluated. Subclonal p53 IHC staining was seen in 4.0% (38 of 957) of cases, with 23 of 957 (2.4%) showing mutant‐pattern p53 staining in ≥10% of tumour cells. It was most commonly seen in POLEmut (nine of 65, 14%) and MMRd (13 of 274, 4.7%) EC (‘multiple classifier’ ECs), where subclonal p53 staining does not impact the molecular subtype diagnosis. Excluding POLEmut and MMRd EC, 11 of 957 (1.1%) showed ≥10% subclonal p53 from which four patients died of disease, while there were no deaths due to disease in the five patients with <10% mutant‐pattern p53 staining. Agreement between p53 immunostaining and TP53 sequencing was 92.6%; most of the discrepant results were in the ultramutated POLEmut or hypermutated MMRd ECs. In NSMP and p53abn EC the agreement between IHC and sequencing was 95.8%.ConclusionsSubclonal p53 staining ≥10% is present in only 1.1% of EC after excluding ‘multiple classifier’ ECs. The cut‐off of ≥10% subclonal p53 staining identified patients at increased risk of dying from EC, supporting its use to diagnose p53abn molecular subtype.