Elimination of restrictive interventions: Is it achievable under the current mental healthcare landscape?

Author:

Snipe Jim1,Searby Adam2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Five Arcs Training and Consultancy Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing & Midwifery Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractThe 2021 release of the report from the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System suggested 65 recommendations to improve a mental healthcare system that was described as “broken”. Several of these recommendations relate to the use of restrictive interventions, such as restraint (both physical and mechanical) and seclusion. These interventions continue to be used in Victorian inpatient mental health facilities today, often in response to aggression and violence towards staff, visitors, family and other consumers. Several health services have committed to the substantial reduction or elimination of the use of restrictive interventions. In this perspective paper, we argue that significant investment is required to achieve this goal. Pressure on mental health nursing staff to cease using restrictive interventions without viable alternatives to de‐escalation, restrictions in the built environment, workforce constraints and a lack of education provided early in nursing careers need to be addressed before we can achieve the elimination of restrictive interventions. We recommend that substantial investment in mental health inpatient units, the mental health nursing workforce, and a systemic shift in the role of the mental health nurse are required to attain sustained reduction and potential elimination of restrictive interventions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pshychiatric Mental Health

Reference48 articles.

1. Six years of national mental health seclusion data: the Australian experience

2. Armytage P. Fels A. Cockram A.&McSherry B.(2021)Royal Commission into Victoria's mental health system. Royal Commission. Available from:https://finalreport.rcvmhs.vic.gov.au/download‐report/

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022)Mental health: restrictive practices. Available from:https://www.aihw.gov.au/mental‐health/topic‐areas/restrictive‐practices

4. Acute mental health nurses’ experience of forcibly touching service users during physical restraint

5. Promoting positive and safe care in forensic mental health inpatient settings: Evaluating critical factors that assist nurses to reduce the use of restrictive practices

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3