Invasive device‐associated skin complications and mechanical dysfunctions in paediatric healthcare: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractAimThis study aimed to estimate the proportion and rate of skin complications and mechanical dysfunction associated with indwelling invasive devices in paediatric healthcare.DesignThis systematic review is reported in accordance with Cochrane standards for randomized controlled trials and the Meta‐analysis of Observation Studies in Epidemiology for cohort studies.Data SourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, clinical trial registries, and unpublished study databases were searched.Review MethodsCohort studies and trials published from January 2011 to June 2022, including (1) indwelling invasive devices, (2) paediatric participants admitted to a hospital, (3) reporting post‐insertion device‐associated skin complication and/or mechanical dysfunction, and (4) published in English, were included. Device‐associated skin complication and mechanical dysfunction (infiltration, leakage, occlusion/blockage, dislodgement/malposition, breakage and others). Pooled proportion and incidence rate per 1000 device days are reported.ResultsThis review synthesized 114 studies (30,782 devices; 1,635,649 device‐days). Skin complications were reported in 40 studies, but none exclusively reported individual device‐related pressure injuries. Mechanical dysfunctions were well‐reported for central venous access devices, peripheral intravenous catheters, nasogastric/gastric tubes and peritoneal dialysis catheters but less for arterial catheters, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular assist devices.ConclusionsThis systematic review highlights the need for standardized definitions and reporting methods to better surveil and benchmark device‐related complications, particularly for understudied device types. Device‐related pressure injuries were not reported in any of the included studies, and all devices except for vascular access devices require standardized reporting of complications.ImpactDespite the widespread use of invasive devices, comprehensive data on their prevalence, utility, and associated paediatric complications is limited. This review identified prevalent skin complications, occlusions and dislodgments in children with devices, underscoring the need for standardized reporting to enhance surveillance and understanding of paediatric device‐related complications.Reporting MethodMOOSE (Meta‐analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) Checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.