Levels of evidence ratings in the urological literature: an assessment of interobserver agreement-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Levels of evidence ratings in the urological literature: an assessment of interobserver agreement

Published:2010-03 Issue:5 Volume:105 Page:602-606
ISSN:1464-4096
Container-title:BJU International
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Turpen Ryan M.,Fesperman Susan F.,Sultan Shahnaz,Borawski Kristy M.,Norris Regina D.,Klink Joseph,Sur Roger L.,Breau Rodney H.,Krupski Tracey L.,Dahm Philipp

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09181.x/fullpdf

Reference19 articles.

1. Grading the evidence: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation;Petrisor;Injury,2006

2. Clinical research and statistical methods in the urology literature;Scales;J Urol,2005

3. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature;Scales;J Urol,2007

4. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement;Welk;J Urol,2006

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement are Unsatisfactory When Determining Abstract Study Design and Level of Evidence;Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics;2022-03-10

2. Penile length augmentation surgical and non-surgical approaches for aesthetical purposes;International Journal of Impotence Research;2021-11-17

3. Levels of evidence supporting European and American community-acquired pneumonia guidelines;European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases;2020-02-06

4. Systematic Review of Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions in Normal Men Complaining of Small Penis Size;Sexual Medicine Reviews;2020-01

5. Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media?;BJU International;2017-05-18