Side effects and short effects of using three common mouthwashes on oral health and quality of life: A quasi‐experimental study

Author:

Navabi Nader1,Afshari Zahra2,Kamyabi Homa1,Mohammadi Mohammad3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Medicine, Dentistry School Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran

2. Private Practice Kerman Iran

3. Department of Periodontics, Dentistry School Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAntiseptic mouthwashes are useful adjuncts to daily brushing and flossing for the control of dental plaque and gingivitis. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect of three mouthwashes: chlorhexidine, essential oils and cetylpyridinium chloride on oral health‐related quality of life, gingival health, tongue coating and also to compare their potential side effects after 2‐week consumption.MethodsSixty participants were enrolled in this study and were divided into four groups (three mouthwash groups plus no mouthwash group). At the beginning, scaling and cleaning were performed and the following parameters were recorded: oral health impact profile (OHIP‐5) questionnaire, tongue coating index, modified gingival index, calculus surface index, modified Lobene stain index and a questionnaire for side effects. Each group has followed up in 2 weeks. Data were analysed using paired t‐test, ANOVA, Fisher's exact test and Pearson chi‐square.ResultsAt the end of second week, all three mouthwashes significantly improved OHIP‐5 score and reduced modified gingival index whereas essential oils and cetylpyridinium chloride significantly reduced tongue coating index when compared to control group (p < 0.05). The differences between four groups were significant for calculus formation, dental staining and reported burning sensation and changes of taste sensation and perception (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe use of all three mouthwashes has been effective in controlling and reducing gingivitis and tongue coating; however, it appeared that essential oils has the minimum and Chlorhexidine has the maximum side effects. Moreover, the use of all three mouthwashes has been examined to improve the quality of life. Overall, essential oils mouthwash has the best performance among these three mouthwashes.

Funder

Kerman University of Medical Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dentistry (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Prevalence of periodontal disease among adults in India: a systematic review and meta‐analysis;Janakiram C;J Oral Biol Craniofac Res,2020

2. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health;James P;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

3. Effect of chlorhexidine bathing in preventing infections and reducing skin burden and environmental contamination: a review of the literature;Donskey CJ;Am J Infect Control,2016

4. Effect of chlorhexidine cord application on prevention of neonatal sepsis in developing countries: systematic review and meta‐analysis;Gelano TF;Int J Health Sci,2019

5. The effect of mouthrinses on oral malodor: a systematic review;Blom T;Int J Dent Hyg,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3