The effect of primary closure versus secondary closure techniques on postoperative wound pain in patients undergoing mandibular surgery: A meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractThis research is intended to explore the influence of second and first degree closure methods on the degree of wound pain and swelling of the face following the removal of the mandible. For the purpose of this study, three data sets, including PubMed and Embase, were selected. A separate statistical analysis was conducted on the choice of the trial, the collection of data and the risk of bias. Differences between trials were analysed with a chi‐square approach, with data analyses dependent on I2. A sensitivity analysis was conducted, and a possible publication bias was evaluated. Ultimately, nine qualifying trials were chosen out of an original pool of 1922 related trials following an in‐depth evaluation under the eligibility and exclusion criteria, as well as a follow‐up screening. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant change in the degree of post‐operation pain after 1 day operation between one or secondary closures of treatment (MD, −0.46; 95% CI, −0.93, 0.01, p = 0.06); the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences in post‐operation wound pain after 3 days in two group (MD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.68, 0.37, p = 0.56); the results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the post‐operation wound pain after the 7th day in two groups (MD, −0.14; 95% CI, −0.31, 0.03, p = 0.1). The results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the post‐operation wound pain after the 1 day in two groups (MD, −0.26; 95% CI, −0.38, −0.13, p < 0.0001); on the 3rd day after surgery, the face was significantly smaller swelling in the secondary closure of closure compared with the first‐stage closure group (MD, −0.70; 95% CI, −1.40, −0.00, p = 0.05). While there is no obvious effect on post‐operation wound pain in patients with mandibular surgery, there is significant difference in post‐operation face swelling. The findings do not support a preference for any of these methods.