Ecosystem size filters life‐history strategies to shape community assembly in lakes

Abstract

Abstract Enhancing understanding of community assembly rules hinges on shared conceptualizations that operate across scales and levels of ecological organization. Knowledge of the biogeography of life‐history strategies is especially limited but crucial for building fundamental information on the relationships between trait diversity and species richness. The goals of this study were to (i) demonstrate how life histories can be classified using a previously identified triangular continuum of evolutionary trade‐offs; (ii) test whether spatial and temporal heterogeneity in species abundances is linked to life‐history strategy; (iii) compare species‐area relationships across the primary life‐history strategist groups and (iv) explore how species life‐history niche spaces are shaped by ecosystem size and landscape architecture. Fish communities were sampled in 40 lakes that varied widely in volume; 11 lakes were sampled annually for 28 or 42 years. Seventy‐one species were classified as equilibrium, periodic or opportunistic strategists, and species‐area curves were quantified and compared among strategy types. As predicted by life‐history theory, relative abundances of opportunistic strategists were extremely variable over space and time, whereas abundances of equilibrium and periodic strategists were more stable. Small lakes were often dominated by only one species, usually an opportunistic strategist. Species richness increased with ecosystem size, but larger ecosystems were increasingly inhabited by equilibrium, and then, periodic strategists. Richness of periodic species increased with ecosystem size at a faster rate compared with opportunistic species showing that colonization‐extinction points fundamentally vary by strategy. Similarly, life‐history niche space increased with ecosystem size in accord with species‐area relationships but showed saturation behaviour. Niche space became increasingly crowded in large lakes, particularly in lakes with higher hydrologic connectance. Ecosystem size mediates the assembly of communities through effects on environmental stability, hydrology and life‐history filtering. This finding provides novel insights into community assembly at multiple scales and has broad conservation applications. Because ecosystem size filters towards orthogonal and inverse life histories, conservation actions (e.g. fish stockings) that do not consider life‐history and community filtering rules will probably fail.