A randomized phase III study of docetaxel alone versus docetaxel plus S‐1 in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer: JMTO LC09‐01

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy of docetaxel plus S‐1 in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to docetaxel alone.MethodsPatients with previously treated NSCLC were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (arm A) or a combination of docetaxel and S‐1 (arm B) for a maximum of four cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsThe study was terminated early because of poor accrual. The number of patients evaluated were 74 and 77 in arm A and arm B, respectively. The median OS was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8–15.2) and 12.3 months (95% CI: 9.2–14.5) in arms A and B, respectively. In arms A and B, the median progression‐free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.7–4.0) and 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.2–4.7), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.984, 95% CI: 0.682–1.419, p = 0.4569) or progression‐free survival (HR: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.528–1.282, p = 0.0953). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia was higher in arm A than in arm B (44.6% vs. 35.1%). However, the incidence of grade 3 or more febrile neutropenia and infection with neutropenia (12.2% vs. 22.1%) was more frequently observed in arm B.ConclusionsThe prematurely terminated study did not show the benefit of two cytotoxic agents over single‐agent therapy for previously treated NSCLC patients.