The dilemma of analytical method changes for soil organic carbon in long‐term experiments

Author:

Grahmann Kathrin1ORCID,Zwink Mariam2,Barkusky Dietmar1,Verch Gernot3,Sommer Michael14

Affiliation:

1. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany

2. Environmental Informatics University of Applied Sciences for Engineering and Economics (HTW) Berlin Germany

3. Research Station Dedelow Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany

4. Institute of Environmental Science and Geography University of Potsdam Potsdam Germany

Abstract

AbstractLong‐term experiments (LTEs) have provided data to modellers and agronomists to investigate changes and dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) under different cropping systems. As treatment changes have occurred due to agricultural advancements, so too have analytical soil methods. This may lead to method bias over time, which could affect the robust interpretation of data and conclusions drawn. This study aims to quantify differences in SOC due to changes in dry combustion methods over time, using soil samples of a LTE established in 1963 that focuses on mineral and organic fertilizer management in the temperate zone of Northeast Germany. For this purpose, 1059 soil samples, collected between 1976 and 2008, have been analysed twice, once with their historical laboratory method right after sampling, and a second time in 2016 when all samples were analysed using the same elementary analyser. In 9 of 11 soil sampling campaigns, a pairedt‐test provided evidence for significant differences in the historical SOC values when compared with the re‐analysed concentrations of the same LTE sample. In the sampling years 1988 and 2004, the historical analysis obtained about 0.9 g kg−1lower SOC compared with the re‐analysed one. For 1990 and 1998, this difference was about 0.4 g kg−1. Correction factors, an approach often used to correct for different analytical techniques, could only be applied for 5 of 11 sampling campaigns to account for constant and proportional systematic method error. For this particular LTE, the interpretation of SOC changes due to agronomic management (here fertilization) deviates depending on the analytical method used, which may weaken the explanatory power of the historical data. We demonstrate that analytical method changes over time present one of many challenges in the interpretation of time series data of SOC dynamics. Therefore, LTE site managers need to ensure providing all necessary protocols and data in order to retrace method changes and if necessary recalculate SOC.HighlightsA total of 1059 LTE soil samples taken between 1976 and 2008 were re‐analysed for SOC in 2016Several methodological changes for SOC determination led to significant different SOC concentration in the same sampleInterpretation and time series of LTE soil data suffer from consideration of analytical method changes and poor documentation of the sameSoil archive establishment, thorough method protocols and diligent proficiency testing after soil method changes ameliorate the dilemma

Funder

MWFK

German Ministry for Research and Technology

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Soil Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3