How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment

Published:2013-08-19 Issue:3 Volume:10 Page:484-511
ISSN:1740-1453
Container-title:Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Author:

Garrett Brandon,Mitchell Gregory

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Education

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/jels.12017/fullpdf

Reference58 articles.

1. American Bar Association House of Delegates 2012 Revised Resolution 101C http://www.abanow.org/wordpress/wp-content/files_flutter/13285463222012mm101c.pdf

2. Social Science for Pennies;Bohannon;Science,2011

3. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality Data?;Buhrmester;Perspectives on Psychological Science,2011

4. Grandfathering Evidence: Fingerprint Admissibility Rulings from Jennings to Llera Plaza and Back Again;Cole;American Criminal Law Rev.,2004

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Forensic Biometrics: Challenges, Innovation and Opportunities;Driving Forensic Innovation in the 21st Century;2024

2. A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2024

3. Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.;Law and Human Behavior;2023-10

4. A Forensic Science Informational Video Can Help Mock Jurors Evaluate Forensic Expert Testimony;Criminal Justice and Behavior;2023-09-14

5. Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2023-05-08