Melanoma in children: A systematic review and individual patient meta‐analysis

Author:

Pampena Riccardo1ORCID,Piccolo Vincenzo2ORCID,Muscianese Marta3,Kyrgidis Athanassios4ORCID,Lai Michela156ORCID,Russo Teresa2,Briatico Giulia2ORCID,Di Brizzi Eugenia Veronica2ORCID,Cascone Giovanni2,Pellerone Sebastiano2ORCID,Longo Caterina15,Moscarella Elvira2ORCID,Argenziano Giuseppe2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale ‐ IRCCS di Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia Italy

2. Dermatology Unit University of Campania Naples Italy

3. Private Practice Rome Italy

4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

5. Department of Dermatology University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy

6. Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy

Abstract

AbstractThe current evidence on paediatric melanoma is heterogeneous, especially regarding the prognosis of different histological subtypes. We sought to systematically review the evidence on paediatric melanoma, highlighting the major sources of heterogeneity and focusing on available data on single patients. A systematic search was performed from 1948 to 25 January 2021. Only studies reporting at least one case of cutaneous melanoma in patients aged ≤18 years were included. Unknown primary and uncertain malignant melanomas were excluded. Three couples of authors independently performed title/abstract screening and two different authors reviewed all the relevant full texts. The selected articles were manually cross‐checked for overlapping data for qualitative synthesis. Subsequently data on single patients were extracted to perform a patient‐level meta‐analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021233248. The main outcomes were melanoma‐specific survival (MSS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) outcomes. Separate analyses were done of cases with complete information on histologic subtype, focusing on superficial spreading (SSM), nodular (NM) and spitzoid melanomas, as well as of those classified asde‐novo(DNM) and acquired or congenital nevus‐associated melanomas (NAM). The qualitative synthesis covered 266 studies; however, data on single patients were available from 213 studies including 1002 patients. Among histologic subtypes, NM had a lower MSS than both SSM and spitzoid melanoma, and a lower PFS than SSM. Spitzoid melanoma had a significantly higher progression risk than SSM and trended toward lower mortality. Focusing on nevus‐associated status, DNM demonstrated better MSS after progression than congenital NAM, and no differences were highlighted in PFS. Our findings describe the existence of different biological patterns in paediatric melanoma. Specifically, spitzoid melanomas demonstrated intermediate behaviour between SSM and NM and showed a high risk of nodal progression but low mortality. This raises the question of whether spitzoid lesions are being over‐diagnosed as melanoma in childhood.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Dermatology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Outpatient surgery at the Pediatric Dermatology Unit;Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3