Cost‐effectiveness analysis of different treatment modalities in BCG‐unresponsive NMIBC

Author:

Rieger Constantin1ORCID,Schlüchtermann Jörg2,Storz Enno1ORCID,Kastner Lucas1,Pfister David1ORCID,Heidenreich Axel13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Urologic Oncology, Robot‐Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery University of Cologne Cologne Germany

2. Faculty of Law, Business and Economics University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany

3. Department of Urology Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria

Abstract

ObjectiveRadical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care (SOC) in BCG‐unresponsive NMIBC and is associated with a significant health‐related quality‐of‐life burden. Recently, promising results have been published on Gemcitabine/Docetaxel, Pembrolizumab, and Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) as salvage therapy options trying to increase the rate of bladder preservation. Here, we performed a Cost‐Effectiveness‐Analysis of those treatment modalities.Patients and MethodsWe developed a Markov model from a payer's perspective drawing on clinical data of single‐arm trials testing intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel and pembrolizumab in BCG‐unresponsive NMIBC, as well as clinical data from patients receiving hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy HIVEC (n = 29) as intravesical salvage chemotherapy at our uro‐oncological centre in Cologne. Costs were simulated utilising a non‐commercial diagnosis‐related groups grouper, utilities were derived from comparable cost‐effectiveness studies. We used a Monte Carlo simulation to identify the optimal treatment, comparing the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of €50 000 (euro)/quality‐adjusted life year (QALY).ResultsOver a horizon of 10 years, gemcitabine/docetaxel, HIVEC, and pembrolizumab were associated with costs of €48 353, €64 438, and €204 580, as well as a gain of QALYs of 6.16, 6.48, and 6.00, resulting in an ICER of €26 482, €42 567, and €184 533 respectively, in comparison to RC with total costs of €21 871 and a gain of QALYs of 5.01. Monte Carlo simulation identified HIVEC as the treatment of choice under assumption of a WTP of <€50 000.ConclusionConsidering a WTP of <€50 000/QALY, gemcitabine/docetaxel and HIVEC are highly cost‐effective therapeutic options in BCG‐refractory NMIBC, while RC remains the cheapest option. At its current price, pembrolizumab would only be cost‐effective assuming a price reduction of at least 70%.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3