Affiliation:
1. Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA
2. Department of Plastic Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
3. Department of Bioengineering The University of Texas Dallas Texas USA
4. Department of Plastic Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractTransmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is a common surgical procedure for addressing severe forefoot pathologies, such as peripheral vascular disease and diabetic foot infections. Variability in research methodologies and findings within the existing literature has hindered a comprehensive understanding of healing rates and complications following TMA. This meta‐analysis and systematic review aims to consolidate available evidence, synthesising data from multiple studies to assess healing rates and complications associated with closed TMA procedures. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles published from January 1st, 1988, to June 1st, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised studies reporting healing rates in non‐traumatic transmetatarsal amputation patients with more than 10 participants, excluding open TMAs. Two independent reviewers selected relevant studies, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extracted from eligible studies included patient demographics, healing rates, complications, and study quality. Among 22 studies encompassing 1569 transmetatarsal amputations, the pooled healing rate was 67.3%. Major amputation rates ranged from 0% to 55.6%, with a random‐effects pooled rate of 23.9%. Revision rates varied from 0% to 36.4%, resulting in a pooled rate of 14.8%. 30‐day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%, with a fixed‐effects pooled rate of 2.6%. Post‐operative infection rates ranged from 3.0% to 30.7%, yielding a random‐effects pooled rate of 16.7%. Dehiscence rates ranged from 1.7% to 60.0%, resulting in a random‐effects pooled rate of 28.8%. Future studies should aim for standardised reporting and assess the physiological and treatment factors influencing healing and complications.
Reference42 articles.
1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher D;Open Med,2009
2. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
3. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias;Begg CB;Biometrics,1994
4. Limb salvage with transmetatarsal amputation;Efird WG;J Tenn Med Assoc,1989
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献