Mental health nurses' attitudes towards risk assessment: An integrative systematic review

Author:

Dickens Geoffrey L.1ORCID,Al Maqbali Mohammed23ORCID,Hallett Nutmeg4ORCID,Ion Robin5ORCID,Kemp Caroline6,Schoultz Mariyana1ORCID,Watson Fiona1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing Midwifery & Health Northumbria University Newcastle‐Upon‐Tyne UK

2. Northumbria University Newcastle‐Upon‐Tyne UK

3. Fatima College of Health Sciences Mafraq UAE

4. University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

5. University of the West of Scotland Glasgow UK

6. Expert‐by‐Experience Newcastle‐Upon‐Tyne UK

Abstract

Accessible SummaryWhat is known on the subject? Risk assessment and risk management are considered to be important practices carried out by mental health nurses. Risk assessment can help keep mental health service users' safe, but some nurses see it as a ‘tick the box’ exercise. Some studies have looked at nurses' attitudes to risk assessment but no one has systematically described all the studies. What the article adds to existing knowledge? Mental health nurses' attitudes towards risk assessment are diverse with regard to its legitimacy, conduct and value. This study provides an organised framework to help understand the areas in which these different attitudes occur. What are the implications for practice? Since attitudes can influence clinical practice, nurses need to reflect on how they view risk assessment. Further research is required to investigate whether particular attitudes are positive or negative and whether attitudes can be changed. AbstractIntroductionUnderstanding nurses' attitudes towards risk assessment could inform education and practice improvements.Aim/QuestionTo explore mental health nurses' attitudes towards risk assessment.MethodAn integrative systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023398287). Multiple databases (PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO) were searched for primary studies of mental health nurses' attitudes towards risk assessment. Qualitative studies were subject to inductive coding and thematic analysis; quantitative data were integrated with emerging themes.ResultsEighteen articles were included. Qualitative studies commonly lacked rigorous analyses. Four themes emerged: underlying purpose and legitimacy of risk assessment (philosophical orientation); use of structured approaches (technical orientation); value of intuition (intuitive orientation); and service user involvement (relationships orientation). There were contradictory study findings in each thematic category indicating different attitudes among mental health nurses.DiscussionMental health nurses' attitudes towards risk assessment vary in four key domains. Survey studies suggest they are more approving of structured approaches to risk assessment than many qualitative studies suggest. There is a need to develop a valid measure of attitudes to risk assessment.Implications for PracticeThis review could help health organisations to develop strategies to improve their risk assessment policies and practice. There is a need to develop structured training and education programmes.

Funder

Burdett Trust for Nursing

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pshychiatric Mental Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3