Stepwise algorithm using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for differential diagnosis of fat‐poor angiomyolipoma in small renal masses: A prospective validation study

Author:

Toide Masahiro1,Tanaka Hajime1ORCID,Kobayashi Masaki1ORCID,Fujiwara Motohiro1,Nakamura Yuki1,Fukuda Shohei1,Kimura Koichiro2,Waseda Yuma1ORCID,Yoshida Soichiro1,Tateishi Ukihide2,Fujii Yasuhisa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Radiology Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan

Abstract

ObjectivesTo validate the diagnostic accuracy of a stepwise algorithm to differentiate fat‐poor angiomyolipoma (fp‐AML) from renal cancer in small renal masses (SRMs).MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 223 patients with solid renal masses <4 cm and no visible fat on unenhanced computed tomography (CT). Patients were assessed using an algorithm that utilized the dynamic CT and MRI findings in a stepwise manner. The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated in patients whose histology was confirmed through surgery or biopsy. The clinical course of the patients was further analyzed.ResultsThe algorithm classified 151 (68%)/42 (19%)/30 (13%) patients into low/intermediate/high AML probability groups, respectively. Pathological diagnosis was made for 183 patients, including 10 (5.5%) with fp‐AML. Of these, 135 (74%)/36 (20%)/12 (6.6%) were classified into the low/intermediate/high AML probability groups, and each group included 1 (0.7%)/3 (8.3%)/6 (50%) fp‐AMLs, respectively, leading to the area under the curve for predicting AML of 0.889. Surgery was commonly opted in the low and intermediate AML probability groups (84% and 64%, respectively) for initial management, while surveillance was selected in the high AML probability group (63%). During the 56‐month follow‐up, 36 (82%) of 44 patients initially surveyed, including 13 of 18 (72%), 6 of 7 (86%), and 17 of 19 (89%) in the low/intermediate/high AML probability groups, respectively, continued surveillance without any progression.ConclusionsThis study confirmed the high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating fp‐AMLs. These findings may help in the management of patients with SRMs.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3