Transcranial Doppler cerebrovascular reactivity: Thresholds for clinical significance in cerebrovascular disease

Author:

Regenhardt Robert W.123ORCID,Nolan Neal M.13,Das Alvin S.134ORCID,Mahajan Rahul3ORCID,Monk Andrew D.35,LaRose Sarah L.3,Migdady Ibrahim136,Chen Yimin7,Sheriff Faheem8,Bai Xuesong9,Dmytriw Adam A.210,Patel Aman B.2,Snider Samuel B.3,Vaitkevicius Henrikas311

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Neurology Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Neurology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

5. NovaSignal Los Angeles California USA

6. Division of Neurocritical Care Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA

7. Department of Neurology Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital Foshan China

8. Department of Neurology Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine El Paso Texas USA

9. Department of Neurosurgery Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China

10. Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

11. Status Epilepticus Division Marinus Pharmaceuticals Radnor Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and PurposeThresholds for abnormal transcranial Doppler cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) studies are poorly understood, especially for patients with cerebrovascular disease. Using a real‐world cohort with cerebral arterial stenosis, we sought to describe a clinically significant threshold for carbon dioxide reactivity (CO2R) and vasomotor range (VMR).MethodsCVR studies were performed during conditions of breathing room air normally, breathing 8% carbon dioxide air mixture, and hyperventilation. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of CO2R and VMR were calculated for the unaffected side in patients with unilateral stenosis; a deviation of 2 SDs below the mean was chosen as the threshold for abnormal. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for both sides for patients with unilateral and bilateral stenosis were evaluated for sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp).ResultsA total of 133 consecutive CVR studies were performed on 62 patients with stenosis with mean±SD age 55±16 years. Comorbidities included hypertension (60%), diabetes (15%), stroke (40%), and smoking (35%). In patients with unilateral stenosis, mean±SD CO2R for the unaffected side was 1.86±0.53%, defining abnormal CO2R as <0.80%. Mean±SD CO2R for the affected side was 1.27±0.90%. The CO2R threshold predicted abnormal acetazolamide single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (Sn = .73, Sp = .79), CT/MRI perfusion abnormality (Sn = .42, Sp = .77), infarction on MRI (Sn = .45, Sp = .76), and pressure‐dependent exam (Sn = .50, Sp = .76). For the unaffected side, mean±SD VMR was 39.5±15.8%, defining abnormal VMR as <7.9%. For the affected side, mean±SD VMR was 26.5±17.8%. The VMR threshold predicted abnormal acetazolamide SPECT (Sn = .46, Sp = .94), infarction on MRI (Sn = .27, Sp = .94), and pressure‐dependent exam (Sn = .31, Sp = .90).ConclusionsIn patients with multiple vascular risk factors, a reasonable threshold for clinically significant abnormal CO2R is <0.80% and VMR is <7.9%. Noninvasive CVR may aid in diagnosing and risk stratifying patients with stenosis.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3