Opportunities to improve feedback to reduce blood component wastage: Results of a national scheme evaluation

Author:

Staples Sophie1ORCID,Evans Hayley2,Caulfield Jill1,Bend Matthew1,Foy Robbie3,Murphy Michael F.245ORCID,Stanworth Simon J.245ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Blood Stocks Management Scheme, NHS Blood and Transplant Filton UK

2. NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Data Driven Transfusion Practice, Radcliffe, Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK

3. Leeds Institute of Health Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK

4. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK

5. NHS Blood and Transplant John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBlood components are costly and scarce. The Blood Stocks Management Scheme (BSMS) was established in the United Kingdom (UK) to support hospital transfusion services and national blood services through collection, analysis, and monthly feedback of data on blood component inventory and wastage management. There is a growing evidence base on how best to deliver feedback for quality improvement. We assessed the quality and utility of the monthly BSMS component reports.MethodsWe assessed the content of BSMS reports issued in March 2023 against established criteria for effective feedback. Two researchers independently rated whether criteria spanning the five domains of goal setting, data collection, feedback content, feedback display and feedback delivery were fully, partially or not met. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. We conducted an online questionnaire survey of recipients of BSMS reports during March 2023 to assess their use of reports and seek suggestions for improvement.ResultsFive out of 20 criteria for effective feedback were fully met. Areas for improvement included placing more emphasis in the feedback on positive change, linking data and summary messages, and including specific suggestions for action. Respondents highlighted the value of benchmarked comparisons with other hospital transfusion services.ConclusionThere is scope for enhancing the effectiveness and utility of BSMS feedback reports and hence reducing wastage of blood components. This methodology for evaluation of feedback could be utilized to improve other areas of transfusion practice.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

Reference23 articles.

1. Exploring the causes of wastage of blood and its components in a tertiary care hospital blood Bank;Bashir F;Cureus,2021

2. Blood lost: a retrospective review of blood wastage from a massive transfusion protocol in a tertiary Paediatric hospital;Chong D;Child Basel Switz,2022

3. Making every drop count: reducing wastage of a novel blood component for transfusion of trauma patients

4. Blood usage and wastage at an academic teaching hospital before the initial wave of COVID‐19 and during and after its quarantine periods;Nguyen A;Lab Med,2023

5. A review of blood usage and wastage in a tertiary heart center

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3