Affiliation:
1. Centre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
2. Nutrition and Dietetics The Prince Charles Hospital Chermside Queensland Australia
3. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
4. Allied Health Research Collaborative The Prince Charles Hospital Chermside Queensland Australia
5. Dietetics and Food Services Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston Queensland Australia
Abstract
AbstractAimsTo explore adult inpatients' perceptions, understanding and preferences regarding the term ‘malnutrition’ and to identify the terms that adult inpatients report are used by themselves and health workers to describe malnutrition.DesignThis qualitative study was conducted using data collected for a separate qualitative study that investigated factors that influence the dietary intake of long‐stay, acute adult inpatients.MethodsSemi‐structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of current inpatients. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis.ResultsNineteen interviews were included (mean age 64 years (standard deviation ±17), 10 female (53%), 12 malnourished (63%)). Four categories were identified. ‘Variation in patients' recognition of malnutrition’ represents the differing abilities of patients to understand and identify with the term ‘malnutrition’. ‘Recognising individuals' needs and preferences’ highlights patients' varying beliefs regarding whether ‘malnutrition’ is or is not an appropriate term and participants' suggestion that health workers should tailor the term used to each patient. ‘Inconsistencies in health workers' and patients' practice regarding malnutrition terminology’ encapsulates the multiple terms that were used to describe malnutrition by health workers and patients. ‘Importance of malnutrition education’ summarises patients' views that health workers should provide patient education on malnutrition prevention, management and complications.ConclusionFindings highlight variations in patients' perceptions and understanding of the term ‘malnutrition’ and differences in the terms used by patients and health workers to describe malnutrition.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe terminology used by health workers to describe malnutrition risk or malnutrition to their patients can influence patients' recognition of their nutritional status and thus the multidisciplinary management of the condition. To ensure that patients receive information about their malnutrition risk or diagnosis in a way that meets their needs, health workers' practices must be revised. To do this, it is imperative to conduct further collaborative research with patients and health workers to identify optimum terms for ‘malnutrition’ and how health workers should communicate this to patients.Impact
There is a disparity in patients' perceptions, understanding and preferences for the term ‘malnutrition’ and there are inconsistencies in how health workers communicate malnutrition to patients.
To support patients' recognition and understanding of their nutritional status, it is imperative for health workers to consider how they discuss malnutrition with patients.
Reporting MethodAdheres to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (Tong et al., 2007).Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.
Funder
Metro North Hospital and Health Service
Reference35 articles.
1. Health literacy in rural and urban populations: A systematic review
2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2023).The NSQHS Standards: Partnering with Consumers Standard. Retrieved December 20 2023 fromhttps://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs‐standards/partnering‐consumers‐standard
3. I don’t know what type of arthritis I have: A population-based comparison of people with arthritis who knew their specific type and those who didn’t