Exploring adult inpatients' perceptions, understanding and preferences regarding the term ‘malnutrition’: A qualitative study

Author:

Mackay Sarah12ORCID,Botero Liliana3ORCID,Bell Jack34ORCID,Young Adrienne15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Nutrition and Dietetics The Prince Charles Hospital Chermside Queensland Australia

3. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Allied Health Research Collaborative The Prince Charles Hospital Chermside Queensland Australia

5. Dietetics and Food Services Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo explore adult inpatients' perceptions, understanding and preferences regarding the term ‘malnutrition’ and to identify the terms that adult inpatients report are used by themselves and health workers to describe malnutrition.DesignThis qualitative study was conducted using data collected for a separate qualitative study that investigated factors that influence the dietary intake of long‐stay, acute adult inpatients.MethodsSemi‐structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of current inpatients. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis.ResultsNineteen interviews were included (mean age 64 years (standard deviation ±17), 10 female (53%), 12 malnourished (63%)). Four categories were identified. ‘Variation in patients' recognition of malnutrition’ represents the differing abilities of patients to understand and identify with the term ‘malnutrition’. ‘Recognising individuals' needs and preferences’ highlights patients' varying beliefs regarding whether ‘malnutrition’ is or is not an appropriate term and participants' suggestion that health workers should tailor the term used to each patient. ‘Inconsistencies in health workers' and patients' practice regarding malnutrition terminology’ encapsulates the multiple terms that were used to describe malnutrition by health workers and patients. ‘Importance of malnutrition education’ summarises patients' views that health workers should provide patient education on malnutrition prevention, management and complications.ConclusionFindings highlight variations in patients' perceptions and understanding of the term ‘malnutrition’ and differences in the terms used by patients and health workers to describe malnutrition.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe terminology used by health workers to describe malnutrition risk or malnutrition to their patients can influence patients' recognition of their nutritional status and thus the multidisciplinary management of the condition. To ensure that patients receive information about their malnutrition risk or diagnosis in a way that meets their needs, health workers' practices must be revised. To do this, it is imperative to conduct further collaborative research with patients and health workers to identify optimum terms for ‘malnutrition’ and how health workers should communicate this to patients.Impact There is a disparity in patients' perceptions, understanding and preferences for the term ‘malnutrition’ and there are inconsistencies in how health workers communicate malnutrition to patients. To support patients' recognition and understanding of their nutritional status, it is imperative for health workers to consider how they discuss malnutrition with patients. Reporting MethodAdheres to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (Tong et al., 2007).Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.

Funder

Metro North Hospital and Health Service

Publisher

Wiley

Reference35 articles.

1. Health literacy in rural and urban populations: A systematic review

2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2023).The NSQHS Standards: Partnering with Consumers Standard. Retrieved December 20 2023 fromhttps://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs‐standards/partnering‐consumers‐standard

3. I don’t know what type of arthritis I have: A population-based comparison of people with arthritis who knew their specific type and those who didn’t

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3