Interprofessional teams with and without nurse practitioners and the level of adherence to best practice guidelines in cardiac surgery: A retrospective study

Author:

Audet Li‐Anne1ORCID,Lavoie‐Tremblay Mélanie23,Tchouaket Éric4,Kilpatrick Kelley156

Affiliation:

1. Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

2. Faculté des sciences infirmières, Pavillon Marguerite‐d'Youville Université de Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada

3. Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR‐IUSMM) Montréal Quebec Canada

4. Département des sciences infirmières, Canadian Research Chair in Economics of Infection and Prevention Control Université du Québec en Outaouais Saint‐Jérôme Quebec Canada

5. Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est‐de‐l'Île‐de‐ Montréal‐Hôpital Maisonneuve‐Rosemont (CIUSSS‐EMTL‐HMR) Montreal Quebec Canada

6. Susan E. French Chair in Nursing Research and Innovative Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ingram School of Nursing McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

Abstract

AbstractAimTo examine the level of adherence to best‐practice guidelines of interprofessional teams with acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) compared to interprofessional teams without ACNPs.DesignA retrospective observational study was conducted in 2023.MethodA retrospective cohort was created including 280 patients who underwent a coronary artery bypass graft and/or a valve repair and hospitalised in a cardiac surgery unit of a university affiliated hospital in Québec (Canada) between 1 January 2019 to 31 January 2020.The level of adherence to best‐practice guidelines was measured from a composite score in percentage. The composite score was created from a newly developed tool including 99 items across six categories (patient information, pharmacotherapy, laboratory tests, post‐operative assessment, patient and interprofessional teams' characteristics). Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were computed to examine the effect of interprofessional teams with ACNPs on the level of adherence to best‐practice guidelines.ResultsMost of the patients of the cohort were male and underwent a coronary artery bypass graft procedure. Patients under the care of interprofessional teams with ACNP were 1.72 times more likely to reach a level of adherence higher than 80% compared to interprofessional teams without ACNPs and were 2.29 times more likely to be within the highest quartile of the scores for the level of adherence to best‐practice guidelines of the cohort.ImpactThis study provides empirical data supporting the benefits of ACNP practice for patients, interprofessional teams and healthcare organisations.Relevance for PracticeOur findings identify the important contributions of interprofessional teams that include ACNPs using a validated instrument, as well as their contribution to the delivery of high quality patient care.Reporting MethodThis study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies guidelines.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Funder

Réseau de recherche portant sur les interventions en sciences infirmières du Québec

Publisher

Wiley

Reference39 articles.

1. Value of nurse practitioner inpatient hospital staffing;Aiken L. H.;Medical Care,2021

2. When to use the Bonferroni correction;Armstrong R. A.;Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,2014

3. Development of a measure of adherence to best practice guidelines by interprofessional teams with nurse practitioners in cardiac surgery;Audet L.‐A.;Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing,2023

4. The level of adherence to best‐practice guidelines by interprofessional teams with and without acute care nurse practitioners in cardiac surgery: A study protocol;Audet L.‐A.;PLoS One,2023

5. The association between advanced practice nursing roles and outcomes in adults following cardiac surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials;Audet L.‐A.;International Journal of Nursing Studies,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3