How much cannabis is used in a joint in Australia? An experimental investigation into use by potency and frequency

Author:

Dawson Danielle12ORCID,Stjepanovic Daniel1ORCID,Lorenzetti Valentina3,Hall Wayne D.14,Leung Janni12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia

2. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia

3. Neuroscience of Addiction and Mental Health Program, Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University Melbourne Australia

4. Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Science, The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionCannabis use is highly prevalent in Australia, yet current survey metrics measure tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure with limited accuracy. Often survey items measure cannabis quantity by assuming specific modes of use (i.e., ‘how many joints do you use?’), which fail to capture variations in cannabis use and the diverse modes of use (e.g., joints, cones, spliffs). This study investigated how much cannabis is used in these modes of administration in an Australian sample.MethodsParticipants (N = 31, Mage = 25.77; 51% university students) completed the Roll a Joint Paradigm in which they rolled joints, spliffs and packed cones as they would typically, using oregano as ‘cannabis.’ Participants then prepared each again but with cannabis of higher or lower potency.ResultsThe amount of cannabis used across different modes of administration was variable: joints (range 0.10–1.25 g), spliffs (range 0.12–1.21 g) and cones (range 0.03–0.41 g). Participants who used cannabis daily rolled three times the amount of cannabis into a joint.Discussion and ConclusionsThe amount of cannabis used in common modes of administration may be highly variable. Daily use may be associated using larger quantities of cannabis. Titration attempts based on potency were not proportional or consistent across modes of administration. The results indicate people may adjust the quantity of cannabis based on perceived potency, however, not proportional to THC concentration. Inconsistency in the amount of cannabis used based on potency and within different modes of administration may represent a problem for self‐report metrics which ask participants to report cannabis use in joints.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference26 articles.

1. Trends in cannabis use intention around the period of cannabis legalisation in Australia: An age‐period‐cohort model

2. Validation of self‐reported cannabis dose and potency: an ecological study

3. Quantifying cannabis: A field study of marijuana quantity estimation.

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2016. Canberra ACT Detailed findings [Internet].2017Available from:https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/15db8c15‐7062‐4cde‐bfa4‐3c2079f30af3/21028.pdf.aspx?inline=true page 61 [Cannabis]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3