Cross‐Sector Partnership Research at Theoretical Interstices: Integrating and Advancing Theory across Phases

Author:

Sadri Mohamad1ORCID,Aristidou Angela23,Ravasi Davide2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Simon Fraser University

2. University College London School of Management

3. Stanford University Digital Economy Lab at the Human‐Centred AI Centre

Abstract

AbstractCross‐sector partnerships (XSPs) are embraced by policymakers and practitioners to address complex social and environmental challenges that no single sector can tackle alone. However, extant research on XSPs has primarily focused on isolated phases and singular theoretical perspectives. In our paper, we synthesize XSP research in the public policy and management fields to deliver a comprehensive and coherent understanding of XSPs’ different phases and theoretical perspectives – the XSP ‘theoretical topology’. We introduce two approaches for theoretical enrichment: informing and interacting. We emphasize the significance of ‘theoretical interstices’ as undominated spaces for new knowledge exploration. Through our integrative cross‐phase, cross‐theoretical approach, we address fundamental yet open questions on XSP effectiveness, value, and impact. Our work challenges existing understandings and opens new research possibilities; offers implications for practitioners; and informs current policy debates on mandating XSPs and on the role of ‘big data’ – powered algorithms in the XSP landscape.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference112 articles.

1. Managing tensions and divergent institutional logics in firm–NPO partnerships;Ahmadsimab A.;Journal of Business Ethics,2019

2. Managing Tensions and Divergent Institutional Logics in Firm–NPO Partnerships

3. Organizational identity;Albert S.;Research in Organizational Behavior,1985

4. Governance by targets and the performance of cross‐sector partnerships: Do partner diversity and partnership capabilities matter?

5. From Animosity to Affinity: The Interplay of Competing Logics and Interdependence in Cross-Sector Partnerships

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3