Nurses' experiences and perceptions of running nurse‐led clinics: A scoping review

Author:

Pu Xiaomeng12ORCID,Malik Gulzar2,Murray Christine2

Affiliation:

1. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore what is known about nurses' experiences and perceptions of running nurse‐led clinics.BackgroundNurse‐led clinics were established to address health care needs. In collaboration with medical practitioners, advanced practice nurses may take a selected group of patients and manage their ongoing healthcare independently. Their experiences in running nurse‐led clinics directly impact patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.DesignScoping review of the peer‐reviewed literature.Data SourceSystematic search through CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from January 2010 to September 2023.Review MethodsThis scoping review is guided by the updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping review from Joanna Briggs Institute.ResultsOf 2747 retrieved articles, 15 were included in this review. Synthesis of the findings revealed that nurses believed implementing nurse‐led clinics was beneficial to themselves, patients, and healthcare systems. However, they faced challenges in running nurse‐led clinics, including insufficient support, teamwork obstacles and lack of role recognition.ConclusionNurses need to be proactive in promoting their clinics and overcoming challenges. Healthcare organizations are responsible for creating a positive culture to support nurse‐led services. Future research should focus on ways to increase global awareness of nurse‐led clinics.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference49 articles.

1. Job satisfaction of nurses in various clinical;Andrioti P. D.;International Journal of Caring Sciences,2017

2. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

3. Perceptions of the benefits and challenges of the role of advanced practice nurses in nurse-led out-of-hours care in Hong Kong: a questionnaire study

4. Effectiveness of nurse‐led clinics on healthcare delivery: An umbrella review

5. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2019a).CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. Retrieved fromCASP‐Qualitative‐Checklist‐2018.pdf(casp‐uk.net)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3