A Motivated Defense of Meat: Biased Perceptions of Meat's Environmental Impact-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Motivated Defense of Meat: Biased Perceptions of Meat's Environmental Impact

Published:2020-03 Issue:1 Volume:76 Page:54-69
ISSN:0022-4537
Container-title:Journal of Social Issues
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Social Issues

Author:

Ginn Joel¹,Lickel Brian¹

Affiliation:

1. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Social Sciences

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/josi.12362

Reference21 articles.

1. Abrahamse W. Gatersleben B. &Uzzell D.(2009).Encouraging sustainable food consumption: The role of (threatened) identity. RESOLVE Working Paper 04–09 University of Surrey.

2. Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance

3. Climate Change and Disasters

4. Help the climate, change your diet: A cross-sectional study on how to involve consumers in a transition to a low-carbon society

5. Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Tasting and labeling meat substitute products can affect consumers’ product evaluations and preferences;Food Quality and Preference;2024-09

2. Self-serving beliefs about science: Science justifies my weaknesses (but not other people’s);Public Understanding of Science;2024-07-30

3. The role of norm dynamics for climate relevant behavior: A 2019–2021 panel study of red meat consumption;Ecological Economics;2024-04

4. Eco-score labels on meat products: Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable choices;Food Quality and Preference;2023-10

5. People’s Values and Preferences about Meat Consumption in View of the Potential Environmental Impacts of Meat: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-12-24