Affiliation:
1. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
2. Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis Indiana USA
3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Headache Center Bronx New York USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundWe evaluated galcanezumab for migraine prevention in patients who met International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria for menstrually related migraine (MRM).MethodsPatients were identified post hoc from three double‐blind, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials in patients with episodic migraine. Patients completed a 1‐month prospective baseline period and up to 6 months (EVOLVE‐1 and ‐2, studies pooled) of double‐blind treatment with galcanezumab (120 mg/month) or placebo. Menses and headache information were recorded by electronic daily diary. Patients with a migraine attack starting during the 5‐day perimenstrual interval (first day of bleeding ± 2 days) for ≥2 of their first three diary‐recorded menstrual cycles were categorized as having MRM. The primary efficacy measure was mean change in monthly migraine headache days from baseline, averaged over Months 4 through 6. Response rates, change in monthly perimenstrual migraine headache days, monthly non‐perimenstrual migraine headache days, and quality of life were also assessed.ResultsPost hoc MRM analysis criteria were met by 462/1133 women (41%). Mean (standard deviation) baseline monthly migraine headache days were 9.7 (±3.1; n = 146) for galcanezumab‐treated patients and 9.6 (±2.8; n = 316) for placebo‐treated patients. The mean change (standard error [SE]) in migraine headache days over Months 4 through 6 was −5.1 days (±0.39) for galcanezumab versus −3.2 (±0.35) for placebo (p < 0.001). The mean change (SE) in perimenstrual migraine headache days over Months 4 through 6 was −0.75 days (±0.08) for galcanezumab versus −0.49 (±0.07) for placebo (p = 0.004). For migraine headache days outside the perimenstrual period, the mean change in migraine headache days was −4.6 (±0.38) for galcanezumab and −2.8 (±0.33) for placebo (p < 0.001). Improvements in response rates and the Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire were also observed over Months 4 through 6.ConclusionGalcanezumab was effective for migraine prevention in women with MRM.
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Migraine in women;Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain;2024-06-14